Activity

jscott991 Nice looking. This ship would look so much better with a smaller keyhole. :(

jscott991 @Mel_Miniatures What about keeping the "hole" but making the part that juts out a little flatter? Is that a possibility?

jscott991 @Mel_Miniatures Any chance you would make a version of this with a smaller keyhole or even no keyhole at all?

jscott991 This ship is positively gorgeous in person, but it's HUGE. It doesn't fit very well with the FFG Victory or ISD. Why so big?

jscott991 @occam13 This truly looks fantastic in person. It is probably the best of its kind. The only problem is that it is just a bit too small to be a 1/3788 represenation. It doesn't quite fit with a FASA/Gamescience Fed CA (SFB scale).

jscott991 Then don't worry about it. The black hi-def is probably what i will order in that case. Thanks again!

jscott991 @shiftdel Thanks! Looks great. Any chance you could offer it in WSF polished?

jscott991 @Nashstarshipyards How about a saucer section width of 1.367 inches?

jscott991 @Nashstarshipyards Why does the Baker refit not scale with the Axanar Baker and the regular Baker? The saucer is significantly bigger for some reason.

jscott991 @shiftdel I really appreciate it!

jscott991 @shiftdel Would you consider doing a version of this a bit smaller, 1/3788 scale, to go with SFB miniatures?

jscott991 @Nashstarshipyards Again, great ship once it's printed. However, like your other JJ ships, I think the nacelles mounting struts need to be a little thicker to avoid warping or bending during shipping. The first one I received was actually broken and the second was quite bent up (although heat fixed it to some extent).

jscott991 @Nashstarshipyards This is a fantastic looking ship once it's printed. However, the two that I've received from Shapeways have problems with the nacelles being warped. I think you need to make the struts attaching the engines to the engineering section a bit thicker. It would help a lot and wouldn't hurt the look.

jscott991 @coelian276 These looks great in FUD. I would recommend making the phasers on the top of the saucer stand out a little more. They don't really show up in the printed version as well as the two on the bottom of the saucer for whatever reason. I ended up getting 4 of these and it's the same thing on all of them. Otherwise a perfect replacement for the rather clunky Fed Destroyer and Scout by Zocchi or SFB.

jscott991 @coelian276 Awesome! Any chance of the Kelvin Enterprise being made in this scale?

jscott991 @apollo I will keep watching for the update. :)

jscott991 Seems to be missing it's impulse engines.

jscott991 @lord_of_the_red_rings This is a solid design (I ordered it in WSF). However the lack of impulse engines and the photon torpedo launcher is kind of noticeable at this size.

jscott991 @coelian276 Looks great!

jscott991 This is a solid design. However, having bought it in WSF, I highly recommend further buyers to just pay for FUD. The WSF washes out most of the details.

jscott991 @Justadude87 Awesome paint job. She sure is tiny.

jscott991 Any chance of this being offered in WSF polished?

jscott991 This looks extremely similar to the Fifth Element cruiser, which I've been looking for a while.

jscott991 This is the best looking WWI ship on Shapeways ( I think I own them all). However, the WSF polished is extremely prone to damage. The masts, turrets, and things that stick out on the sides have all arrived broken or bent. It's quite a crapshoot.

jscott991 @GottMitUns205 That's an absurdly well painted Venator!

jscott991 You should consider offering these in polished WSF. They look very good in WSF (I have your Scharnhorsts and Lutzows), but I've noticed the polished takes some of the graininess away.

jscott991 Very cool. Hoping you'll tackle the First Order Star Destroyer at some point.