| Santisima Trinidad- bow gallery [message #44954] Tue, 06 March 2012 15:36 UTC |
 |
|
As some of you might know (most probably not but anyway...) apart from being a 3d artist, I am a ship modeler. Now- it happened that my wife bought me an expensive but not VERY detailed model of spanish ship of line, Santisima Trinidad. Now- kit is not very detailed and I am doing historical research and constantly upgrading it so what you can see here is a result of that struggle.
Original representation of bow gallery is not very detailed... at best. I've decided to upgrade it a bit.
Here is one of ref photos (Museo Naval, Madrit, original model shown to king for approval of a new ship design) I got

Based on photos and dimmensions from plan I've sketched a base layout of gallery...

... created a 3d model

... and just today got a final print (yes, I know, there is a fly on a photo). It fits perfectly to model, at the same time prooving to me that in this case, in 1/90 scale difference between a flat and properly shaped deck is- sadly- invisible. Small rail details are below half of the milimeter in radius (at thinest place). Obtaining same results using traditional methods would be maybe not impossible, but certainly would call for a world- class modeling skill.

Hope you enjoyed the story, more to come.
|
|
|
| Re: Santisima Trinidad- bow gallery [message #44955 is a reply to message #44954 ] Tue, 06 March 2012 15:43 UTC |
  |
|
Very nice story, are you planning on making the doors hinged?
The Mad Moder
michael@shapeways.com
|
|
|
| Re: Santisima Trinidad- bow gallery [message #44956 is a reply to message #44955 ] Tue, 06 March 2012 16:00 UTC |
  |
|
Not really- that would call for reconstruction of interior and I do not think I do have enough knowledge for that BUT I have no other choice then to reconstruct and print all THAT:
|
|
|
|
| Re: Santisima Trinidad- bow gallery [message #45682 is a reply to message #45679 ] Mon, 19 March 2012 02:35 UTC |
 |
|
I hardly have a choice- doing it "by hand", traditional way would give very unpredictable results and mistakes would be way too costly- its cheaper to do it in 3d (plus- better details). Yeah, I know- cheating
|
|
|