|
| Re: Static Image Display [message #46866 is a reply to message #46847 ] Thu, 12 April 2012 17:20 UTC |
  |
|
Sorry... I'm still not comprehending what you are suggesting. Most of those images seem to me to be equal in quality/resolution.
Patience, Persistance, Politeness - the 3Ps will help us get us to Perfect Printed Products
|
|
|
| Re: Static Image Display [message #46881 is a reply to message #46866 ] Thu, 12 April 2012 18:52 UTC |
|
|
| stonysmith wrote on Thu, 12 April 2012 17:20 |
Sorry... I'm still not comprehending what you are suggesting. Most of those images seem to me to be equal in quality/resolution.
|
I notice the shapeways image is not as crisp. Especially if you look at the leaf itself (open both and switch back and forth) Maybe this is done for load speed? I don't know graphics or coding so I have no idea.
The Mad Moder
michael@shapeways.com
|
|
|
| Re: Static Image Display [message #46888 is a reply to message #46881 ] Thu, 12 April 2012 19:59 UTC |
|
|
Yep, one picture is ten times the size of the other. And if you work out how many photos Shapeways hosts you may get an inkling of how much more bandwidth higher definition images would cost them.
Bill Bedford
|
|
|
| Re: Static Image Display [message #46916 is a reply to message #46847 ] Fri, 13 April 2012 07:04 UTC |
|
|
You may open both links, compare the image with keyboard and compare the words on the keyboard. Keyboard words are clear on Behance.net and blur on Shapeways.com
You may learn more about image over compression at
http://brycetech.daz3d.com/tutor/windows/jpeg_compression.ht ml
Shapeways display images in dynamic means, which usually require Adobe Flash Player for viewing.
Behance display images in static means, which simply list all images one after another and do not require Adobe Flash Player for viewing.
[Updated on: Fri, 13 April 2012 07:09 UTC]
Plain Orb
|
|
|
Search
