Hey,
@gregorykress, I'm trying to figure this out here.
I've got a model that is 2.01 cubic cm which is about 0.63 oz of copper. If I use the price
@DaveC1964 found, that's a little over 10 cents worth of material. If
@coelian276 is right, it could easily rise to 22 cents (double plus 10%).
To get it printed, however? $70.21 — unpolished.
So, the final material might account for anywhere between 1.5% and 3% of the price. 97% is going to something else. Some is clearly going to the 3d-printed wax (remember when we could actually order wax?) According to the now-completely-outdated metric castable wax was something like $10 + $8 per cubic centimeter. For my little bauble, that would have been $26.08.
So, let's say $30 to print the wax. 22 cents worth of copper. Where's the other $40 coming from? Remember that this is also assuming that SW was charging us at-cost for castable wax. As long as they were making any profit at all, that part of the cost should actually be lower— potentially much lower. If that cost is accurate and the rest is just labor, can we get the castable wax back? I'll gladly make my own mold (I've done both sand and plaster casting and can access a foundry). I like trimming sprues— it's a relaxing way to start on the final polish.
It only gets more strange to look at casting the same part in silver. It should be the same process with the same amount of labor. There may be different amounts of material needed, but not quite enough to justify the difference in cost.
In silver, the same part is $100.30 — also unpolished.
Silver, however, is currently $17.62 per ounce. Working on the double plus 10% rule, that
should cost $23.31 but it has over a $30 difference. It's conceivable that you could have enough waste/spillage to justify the difference (although my jewelry professor would be angry at me if I'd ever wasted that much silver). Needing double plus a safety margin is totally understandable when you're in a jewelry class learning lost wax for the first time. I've known professionals who'd figured out how to get perfect pours with only a tiny amount of waste and the most beautifully economical sprues you can imagine. It is possible, even with needing excess for each pour, to recycle the cast sprues (especially with silver) so the idea of every maker bearing the same cost of extra material is also not quite right.
SW should be working to make the process as efficient as possible, or at least providing us some reason the cost is so high.
The message,
@gregorykress, is that we want to be excited. We want to try out all your new materials, but it's just not going to happen if we feel like we're being gouged.