<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-15"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php">
  <title>Shapeways: Bring your creativity to life in 3D</title>
  <link>http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php</link>
  <description>Shapeways: Bring your creativity to life in 3D</description>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=32105&amp;th=6031#msg_32105" />
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=32105&amp;th=6031#msg_32105">
  <title>Are Shapeways now shipping customer orders faster than ours?</title>
  <link>http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=32105&amp;th=6031#msg_32105</link>
  <description><![CDATA[I've Just had notice that a customer order in WSF placed on the 2nd of August has now shipped  - less than three days ! <br />
<br />
But one of my own orders placed on 26th July - also in WSF - has not even gone into production yet . So are you giving higher priority external customer orders is is it just that my own order is more complicated  a bulk pack rather than 5 individual items ?<br />
<br />
i'm not complaining about this BTW -   it's probably a good policy if it exists, just curious. <br />
<br />
Tom]]></description>
  <dc:subject></dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>tebee</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2011-08-05T11:56:54-00:00</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>