<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-15"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php">
  <title>Shapeways: Bring your creativity to life in 3D</title>
  <link>http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php</link>
  <description>Shapeways: Bring your creativity to life in 3D</description>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=55366&amp;th=11185#msg_55366" />
			<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=55387&amp;th=11185#msg_55387" />
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=55366&amp;th=11185#msg_55366">
  <title>Volume discrepancy question</title>
  <link>http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=55366&amp;th=11185#msg_55366</link>
  <description><![CDATA[I modeled a multi-part model in Unigraphics, which can calculate the volume of your model.  When I compare my calculated volume to the volume shown on Shapeways when I upload it, they're not the same.  What am I missing?  The volume shown on the site is like 18cc MORE than my calculated number.<br />
<br />
Here's the model:  <a href="http&#58;&#47;&#47;www.shapeways.com/model/737734/b0f0c61eb2857af67ad19ce4fafaa7e8" target="_blank">   http://www.shapeways.com/model/737734/b0f0c61eb2857af67ad19c e4fafaa7e8</a><br />
<br />
My calculated volume is:  198 cc<br />
<br />
Shapeways volume shown online is:  216 cc<br />
<br />
<br />
Why does it show more?  I've got a lot of hollow volumes in it, but they've all got drain/access holes, so there's no captive holes.  Any ideas?<br />
<br />
Normally I wouldn't care too much about the volume, but this is a pretty big model and I was being very judicious with volume to keep cost down, but now it doesn't match my predictions, and it costs more than I expected.<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks! <br />
<br />
   ~ Ben]]></description>
  <dc:subject></dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Mid7night</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012-10-15T03:54:41-00:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=55387&amp;th=11185#msg_55387">
  <title>Re: Volume discrepancy question</title>
  <link>http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=rview&amp;goto=55387&amp;th=11185#msg_55387</link>
  <description><![CDATA[UPDATE!<br />
<br />
I fixed the volume discrepancy problem - I had a hollow void that I forgot to add a drain hole for.  So now the volume matches exactly, but I still get an error-email telling me that my model is too big; which I KNOW Is bogus because I modeled it to fit in the WSF bounding box.<br />
<br />
Do our uploaded models have to be in a certain orientation for the auto-check program to work?  Like, maybe it's too &quot;wide&quot;, but if you rotate it 90° it would fit being &quot;tall&quot;?<br />
<br />
ANYONE?!]]></description>
  <dc:subject></dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Mid7night</dc:creator>
  <dc:date>2012-10-15T15:30:07-00:00</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>