|
|
| Re: rotating pill box [message #3767 is a reply to message #3739 ] Sun, 05 April 2009 08:32 UTC |
  |
|
Cool object !
| Quote: | Shapeways has stated they cannot yet guarantee the "food safety" of their plastics
|
Nevertheless, wsf (PA 2200 Fine polyamid) is biocompatible, so no problem...
|
|
|
| Re: rotating pill box [message #3768 is a reply to message #3767 ] Sun, 05 April 2009 09:50 UTC |
  |
|
| Emm@nuel wrote on Sun, 05 April 2009 08:32 |
Nevertheless, wsf (PA 2200 Fine polyamid) is biocompatible, so no problem...
|
Maybe for a pill box it is no problem after good cleaning, because the material itself may be safe, but you can't be 100% sure, because of the additional materials used during printing.
|
|
|
| Re: rotating pill box [message #3777 is a reply to message #3733 ] Mon, 06 April 2009 11:17 UTC |
  |
|
Thanks!,
about the safety: yes I did clean it thoroughly. I am not sure about using it, because I expect this material to absorb water. This means that the pills, that have a sugar like layer on the outside, to become sticky.
I am not so afraid of food safety though, I think we eat a lot more toxics we don't know of every day...
www.studiogijs.nl
|
|
|
| Re: rotating pill box [message #3788 is a reply to message #3768 ] Mon, 06 April 2009 14:27 UTC |
  |
|
| frankbuss wrote on Sun, 05 April 2009 09:50 | Maybe for a pill box it is no problem after good cleaning, because the material itself may be safe, but you can't be 100% sure, because of the additional materials used during printing.
|
Isn't WSF formed by SLS, so the support material is just more of the same inert powder?
So far, I'm resisting the urge to chew my WSF offcuts until we get the final word.
|
|
|
|
| Re: rotating pill box [message #3835 is a reply to message #3777 ] Tue, 07 April 2009 14:23 UTC |
 |
|
| Gijs wrote on Mon, 06 April 2009 11:17 | I am not so afraid of food safety though, I think we eat a lot more toxics we don't know of every day...
|
Very true. Hormones, antibiotics & heavy metal in the water, low-grade non-stick coatings, various unpleasant compounds leaching out from food storage inners & bottles, etc. Putting it into perspective, it's all relative. Would WSF be potentially less harmful than the solvents and organic volatiles we work with? Cyano accelerator?
I'm not being deliberately naive when I say I'd consider chewing WSF. It might be better for you than the petrochemical base and artificial sweeteners in the gum I'd otherwise be consuming.
Hey kids, don't chew WSF. Have an apple instead. 
|
|
|