Home » Community » It arrived! » Svengoolie FUD woes
Search Search  
Show: Today's Messages    Show Polls    Message Navigator
Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38875] Sat, 19 November 2011 09:51 UTC Go to next message
avatar spaceboy412  is currently offline spaceboy412
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2011
Go to my shop
Junior Member
This was my first time using FUD which i did because of the detail. The model is 2.75inches tall. I have to say i was amazed at the detail it held from my sculpt.

However i'm greatly disappointed with this Banding which happened to the front and back of the model, its doesn't appear to be normal stepping because instead of the typical pyramid stepping this actually goes "in and out" and at the same size intervals, its almost as if it was shifting or something in the tray.
I've tried to illustrate it in this pic, considering how detailed FUD can be i'm somewhat bothered with whatever happened here, and unsure as to if FUD is worth it.
A good example of this 'wavy' banding is on the chickens neck which should be a smooth line as in the sculpt pic.
The model has been very lightly primed to make it easier to see, obviously if i sand this it will destroy the detail.
The green lines also indicate a very slight symmetrical slash (which was not in my sculpt) on the front of the coat which i suspect was from the support material, too bad that wasn't on the back instead.

  • Attachment: DSCF0241.JPG
    (Size: 467.39KB, Downloaded 342 time(s))

  • Attachment: svengoolie.jpg
    (Size: 135.56KB, Downloaded 222 time(s))

[Updated on: Sat, 19 November 2011 10:15 UTC]

Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38894 is a reply to message #38875 ] Sat, 19 November 2011 18:23 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar ancientbuzzard  is currently offline ancientbuzzard
Messages: 33
Registered: February 2010
Go to all my models
Member
spaceboy412

Sorry to say it seems to be an ongoing problem with FUD, that has been the subject of several threads, including one I started;

http://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=msg&goto=3774 7&&srch=fud#msg_37747

Unfortunately FUD promises to be such a good material, but the problems remain.

Despite giving permission for my pictures to be used on the FUD material page to illustrate this very problem, the page has not been updated to warn buyers of this.

Andrew
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38903 is a reply to message #38894 ] Sat, 19 November 2011 22:46 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar spaceboy412  is currently offline spaceboy412
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2011
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Thank you, I'm reading through all that now, I'm really frustrated because if i had known that would be an issue i would have used another material. I'd rather lose some detail then have that banding. I wish they would have listed that as a issue on the material page.

Do you know if this happens with the White Detail material?
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38906 is a reply to message #38875 ] Sun, 20 November 2011 02:05 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Youknowwho4eva  is currently offline Youknowwho4eva
Messages: 5734
Registered: September 2008
Go to my shop
Shapie Expert
I work here
Spaceboy, have you contacted Support about your print? I'd send them pictures and an explanation of the issue and they'll get you fixed up.


I learned a long time ago the wisest thing I can do is be on my own side, be an advocate for myself and others like me. -Maya Angelou
michael@shapeways.com Community Advocate
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38907 is a reply to message #38906 ] Sun, 20 November 2011 02:25 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar spaceboy412  is currently offline spaceboy412
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2011
Go to my shop
Junior Member
ah okay i'm doing that now thank you.
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38915 is a reply to message #38875 ] Sun, 20 November 2011 11:08 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar ancientbuzzard  is currently offline ancientbuzzard
Messages: 33
Registered: February 2010
Go to all my models
Member
spaceboy412

I've not used Shapeways White Detail for a long time, so others would be better placed to answer that. Hopefully Customer Services will give you a voucher to use against a reprint in another material (and shipping if it was the only thing you ordered?). So it has cost you disappointment and them money, which could be avoided if they had amended the materials page.

I'm sure Youknowwho4eva would agree that what Shapeways is aiming for is to clearly identify the quality we can expect?
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38955 is a reply to message #38875 ] Mon, 21 November 2011 12:44 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar JoostD  is currently offline JoostD
Messages: 30
Registered: December 2010
Go to my shop
Member
I work here
Hi spaceboy412,

I have just emailed you about your received model. I have created a complaint for you.

Please accept our apologies for the bad quality of the model.

Regards,

Joost
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #38960 is a reply to message #38915 ] Mon, 21 November 2011 14:09 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Youknowwho4eva  is currently offline Youknowwho4eva
Messages: 5734
Registered: September 2008
Go to my shop
Shapie Expert
I work here
ancientbuzzard wrote on Sun, 20 November 2011 11:08

spaceboy412

I've not used Shapeways White Detail for a long time, so others would be better placed to answer that. Hopefully Customer Services will give you a voucher to use against a reprint in another material (and shipping if it was the only thing you ordered?). So it has cost you disappointment and them money, which could be avoided if they had amended the materials page.

I'm sure Youknowwho4eva would agree that what Shapeways is aiming for is to clearly identify the quality we can expect?


I think for cases such as this one, the materials page shouldn't be updated, as these results are not acceptable. And I would state that Shapeways is aiming to clearly identify what you expect of the quality. Rather than shapeways saying "this is the process we pick, live with it" the goal would be "the majority like the results of this process so this is what we'll supply"

I can't say for sure, but I think FUD problems have a lot to do with the delay in FUD right now. I think once new machines are up and running, things will start to look a lot better.


I learned a long time ago the wisest thing I can do is be on my own side, be an advocate for myself and others like me. -Maya Angelou
michael@shapeways.com Community Advocate
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39030 is a reply to message #38960 ] Tue, 22 November 2011 07:26 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar ancientbuzzard  is currently offline ancientbuzzard
Messages: 33
Registered: February 2010
Go to all my models
Member
Youknowwho4eva

I agree the results he received weren't acceptable, but Nancy did offer on 1 November;

I can place a warning on the FUD page. Do you mind if I use your models as an example of the roughness?

It does not appear to be an isolated issue, as postings by others show, and there may be a silent number out there who opened the pacakge and thought "oh, not what I expected, I'll try somewhere else".

The problem may only be whilst they are trying to resolve the problems. But that means everyone who has placed an order in the last three weeks (and until they fix it), and did not read all the posts in the forum first, is unkowingly taking a gamble.

As a result they may be very disappointed (even if a reprint is done, it will currently take nearly a month to be received) and never order from Shapeways again. Even if a reprint or voucher for a different material are issued, and well done Shapeways for doing that, surely it is better to manage expectations based on what Shapeways currently can offer, not on what they hope will be the case when the new machines/settings/materials are implemented?

To say that the only options are

"Rather than shapeways saying "this is the process we pick, live with it" the goal would be "the majority like the results of this process so this is what we'll supply"

misses the point. Surely there is the third option of

"the majority like the results of this process so this is what we'll supply, but there may be limitations that you should be aware of"?

Andrew

[Updated on: Tue, 22 November 2011 07:26 UTC]

Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39036 is a reply to message #38875 ] Tue, 22 November 2011 11:53 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar spaceboy412  is currently offline spaceboy412
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2011
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Thank you JoostD, i appreciate that. Smile

As to the rest of the discussion i don't really feel qualified to add much. I made my order on Oct 20 so it was before Nancy's Nov 1st post, which i missed anyway, i'm still not sure where to look for certain things in this forum.
I'm not sure what the correct course of action for the material page would be, however i generally believe the more info the better informed decisions i can make. if there had been a post of a image showing something with the detail that FUD is capable of but also saying the drawback may be lines, also with a image, then that at least would have been something that i could use as a deciding factor as to which material to go with.
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39045 is a reply to message #38875 ] Tue, 22 November 2011 13:41 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Youknowwho4eva  is currently offline Youknowwho4eva
Messages: 5734
Registered: September 2008
Go to my shop
Shapie Expert
I work here
Andrew: lots of good points, but I don't want to swamp this post post with outside discussion, perhaps in the 3D printing section?

Spaceboy: I'm glad they got you fixed up. They always do Very Happy


I learned a long time ago the wisest thing I can do is be on my own side, be an advocate for myself and others like me. -Maya Angelou
michael@shapeways.com Community Advocate
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39047 is a reply to message #39045 ] Tue, 22 November 2011 14:14 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar ancientbuzzard  is currently offline ancientbuzzard
Messages: 33
Registered: February 2010
Go to all my models
Member
Youknowwho4eva

I agree, as there's been enough said on this for a while anyway.

We can get back to designing, Shapeway's to printing, and let "It's arrived!" return to things of joy!

Andrew
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39151 is a reply to message #38875 ] Wed, 23 November 2011 19:47 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Sadwargamer  is currently offline Sadwargamer
Messages: 35
Registered: January 2009
Go to my shop
Member
Unfortunately FUD continues to deliver very poor quality models.

I have ordered thousands of dollars worth of FUD since it became available but over the last two months all my orders have had this terrible banding (not layering due to print process but real banding that undulates in random places of the models). My last 4 prints totally almost $800 i have had to reject due to quality issues.

yes I have contacted support , and as usual they have been fantastic in handling my complaints. The first model reprint was sent, but yep it too was poor quality awaiting a reprint of the reprint!

The other models i am now very concerned at receiving as I strongly believe they will not be as my previous models ordered in terms of quality.

I even asked that the last print ($250! worth) should be really quality checked - but alas it was still shipped with banding issues...

I will be contacting support tonight to request a refund for the latest print instead of a 2 week wait for a reprint that I have zero confidence will be any good.

Clearly FUD worked - I was extremely happy with quality and ramped up production and encouraged my customers to use it, but now something has changed - and shapeways and their partner on FUD need to trace back to when the errors occurred (the forum would be good start as will support complaints numbers) and see what has changed - is it a new batch of print material , a change on how the material is stored, new machine settings...I seem to recall the change occurred around the new pricing structure time (which was even worse !)

Does anyone know of another print bureau who offer the Projet MJM printer like shapeways? even if its more expensive I would rather pay the extra for good quality prints each time!

Regards
Andy
(A very unhappy shapeways customer Sad )




Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39248 is a reply to message #39151 ] Fri, 25 November 2011 04:16 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar spaceboy412  is currently offline spaceboy412
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2011
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Just wanted to add that they are going to reprint, i wish they would have given me a voucher though so i could choose a different material, but fingers crossed.
here is what they wrote, so maybe they have gotten it under control:

"We are actively looking into the problems we have with the machines. Adjustments have been made."
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39255 is a reply to message #38875 ] Fri, 25 November 2011 08:15 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Sadwargamer  is currently offline Sadwargamer
Messages: 35
Registered: January 2009
Go to my shop
Member
An interesting comment:
"We are actively looking into the problems we have with the machines. Adjustments have been made."

But I received this:
"I am very sorry this keeps on happening to your models, but unfortunately this is the quality you can expect in this material. We are looking for other Production Facilities and we have also found one, but I understood from my colleague that the quality is the same." (My emphasis)

My recent reprints were cancelled and I recevied a refund as the last print was also bad (5th in a row!) Unfortunately one of the reprints on order is too far down production cycle so I will wait on that. But have zewro confidence it will be any good which really disappoints me as previously teh quality was perfect.

regards
andy




Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39256 is a reply to message #39255 ] Fri, 25 November 2011 09:37 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar spaceboy412  is currently offline spaceboy412
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2011
Go to my shop
Junior Member
@sadwargamer I'm sorry you've been having such bad luck. What they told you worries me even more now, i really don't want to go through a complaint again if they already know its going to turn out bad, i wonder which info is correct.
i wish they had given me the option of reprint or voucher without just going straight ahead.
Hopefully it is fixed and my model and yours will be ok.

[Updated on: Fri, 25 November 2011 09:38 UTC]

Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #39263 is a reply to message #39255 ] Fri, 25 November 2011 15:57 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar TomBurns  is currently offline TomBurns
Messages: 6
Registered: March 2010
Go to all my models
Junior Member
I have been printing small models through another vendor using the same type of equipment Shapeways uses for FD and FUD (ProJet 3000). I have not encountered any of the problems I have seen reported here with banding, incomplete curing, yellowing, etc. It IS avoidable. I was planning to order some test prints in FUD soon, but if this turns out to be a chronic problem I might have to reconsider.
Re: Svengoolie FUD woes [message #40312 is a reply to message #38875 ] Thu, 15 December 2011 18:55 UTC Go to previous message
avatar spaceboy412  is currently offline spaceboy412
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2011
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Got my reprint yesterday, with mixed results.

The Good: NO BANDING!!!

The Bad: big distortion on the left leg, probably from being removed before curing
The two-layer effect(i think its called that), one side was nice and smooth, the other rough and had some white residue, the biggest problem with this was slight loss of detail on the rough side, but the worst part of it was that it left a visible seam right down the middle of the model. That could have been fixed by allowing a choice in orientation.
I am confused as to the rough/smooth thing though, why its not one or the other.

I wonder if they even do a quick comparison with the 3D model before they ship and what kind of quality control inspection they go through.
It does seem like they are moving in the right direction but i would hold off before i ordered something in FUD myself.

Should i file for a complaint for a reprint due to the distortion, i don't know?

index.php?t=getfile&id=12704&private=0

  • Attachment: DSCF0308.jpg
    (Size: 251.25KB, Downloaded 364 time(s))

[Updated on: Thu, 15 December 2011 18:55 UTC]


 
   
Previous Topic:4-4 case for iPhone 4
Next Topic:Celtic Knot Pendant

Logo

Hello.

We're sorry to inform you that we no longer support this browser and can't confirm that everything will work as expected. For the best Shapeways experience, please use one of the following browsers:

Click anywhere outside this window to continue.