| Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #35788] Mon, 03 October 2011 17:11 UTC |
 |
|
Unfortunately this project has been cancelled due to unforeseen circumstances 
Hi Guys,
Over the last 3 weeks or so I have been creating some designs to be 3D printed in plastic (white strong and flexible polished, and for smaller items Frosted Ultra Detail), with a view to having molds made of them for production in fine porcelain. Some pieces are designed for Jasperware and some sculptural forms too.
I am just waiting on a couple of Shapeways prints to arrive so I can be sure that the level of detail and finish are going to be suitable for molding for super smooth fine porcelain.
1.FUD should be good for jewellery sized objects, and the small plate design below. FUD will also achieve the delicate detail that porcelain can achieve (there is almost no minimum thickness for porcelain - extremely lacelike details can be produced)
2. I am hoping that WSF polished will suit a fractal lithophane/ LED candle holder.
3. Id love to create something lamp sized but WSF polished is only available up to a maximum bounding box of 150x150x150 mm, and FUD is going to be out of my current budget for very large objects.
So does anyone have suggestions on how to smooth large models in White Strong and Flexible? (complex shapes so I cant just sand it etc)
Below are some images of designs that I had intended to produce in fine porcelain. The porcelain manufacturer George Engel (Phoenix Rising Ceramics), provided colour suggestions by emailing me several roughly (photoshopped) variations of my original designs (some shown below).
Janelle

[Updated on: Fri, 25 November 2011 09:28 UTC] unellenu.com
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #36448 is a reply to message #35788 ] Tue, 11 October 2011 22:08 UTC |
  |
|
Hi Janelle,
I'd find a clear acrylic coating (spray) that won't attack the WSF. It will probably take many coats to smooth things out but it should work ehh?
-G
"Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art."
Leonardo da Vinci
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #36595 is a reply to message #36450 ] Thu, 13 October 2011 17:04 UTC |
  |
|
Hi J,
One way or the other you will loose detail if you either build up or take down the as printed surface. Why don't you print it with the FUD material? Costs more sure, but it might give you what you want with less hand work.
-G
"Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art."
Leonardo da Vinci
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #36599 is a reply to message #36595 ] Thu, 13 October 2011 17:17 UTC |
  |
|
Hi Again,
Oh, I see a mold for the lightning element! Actually I think you would not be able to make a suitable "mold" of this design for slip casting porcelain. To many undercuts! I think molds for casting clay slips are usually made from plaster. This aids in drawing the moisture out of the clay slip. I believe this is the same for porcelain. So these would be rigid molds and any undercuts will interfere with getting the model out of the master mold. Back to the drawing board?
-G
"Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art."
Leonardo da Vinci
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #36609 is a reply to message #36599 ] Thu, 13 October 2011 20:11 UTC |
  |
|
Hard mould is the classic tech. New methods use silicone, like resin castings in model making world, which allows some level of undercuts. Someone was advertising his company around here... wait, the link is in the first post. ^_^ Maybe the fractal "roughness" is too much even for silicone, it depends, you could always do some DIY tests first. Things could get stuck and tear the mould or the part, or bubbles appear and give extra material in the wrong place (pro systems use vacuum, so bubbling is minor or zero).
About smoothing, any brushable acrylic varnish, bought from any art shop. They are normally white liquids that dry clear, some even have UV protection. WSF drinks them, and you can pick different grades, from matt to satin to gloss, and combine them in layers if you want the filling properties of one type with the specularity of another. They are also water soluble, so coats can be applied thinner to increase control. It would take more time than spraying, but will ensure you get as thick as you want, and in the places you want.
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #36613 is a reply to message #36599 ] Thu, 13 October 2011 22:17 UTC |
  |
|
Hi Glen,
The porcelain manufacturer (mentioned above) told me he has a proprietary technique for rubber molded ceramic and porcelain - an welcomes undercuts designs.
Janelle
unellenu.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #38497 is a reply to message #38467 ] Sun, 13 November 2011 18:50 UTC |
  |
|
Hi Janelle,
Boron nitride (BN) coatings are used to coat the surfaces of hot molds or any surface that needs resistance to hi temp molten materials. Meaning surfaces intended to to be in contact with molten metals, salts, glass etc. I'm not sure it would be of any use for slip casting porcelain into rubber/silicone molds. Don't get me wrong, BN products work like magic to prevent hot glass or metal from sticking to molds and things, but it seems like your priority is smoothing your master models so a nice clean rubberized mold can be made from it? I think only two choices remain, both are a pain in the butt! Either, -A- hand finish/polish the surfaces or, -B- apply coatings to fill and smooth the surface. I know you have the touch to make this work Janelle .
-G
"Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art."
Leonardo da Vinci
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #38510 is a reply to message #38497 ] Mon, 14 November 2011 02:04 UTC |
  |
|

Thanks electrobloom for your printed rubber mold suggestion - that's something that I hadn't considered at all - could be useful for future projects!
Thanks Glen for your comments too - so you don't think that I could use something like th BN products for smoothing? - I've never tried them before.
I wouldnt mind having something that could give the heart fractal plate a bit more shine but I'm a little hesitant as I don't want to mess the model up. I'll check with PR ceramics if the WSF polished model is OK without a coating for their process.
Here is my progress on the Fractal peaks LED candle holder.
George Engel from Phoenix rising ceramics suggested that I could try coating my model with 'crazy glue (cyanoacrylate) and coat the surface, then sand it with finer and finer sandpapers.' It called 'super glue' here in Australia . So here are the results after 3 coats ( on the fractal part only).
I did it outside on the balcony (really strong fumes) and used latex gloves so I didn't adhere myself to the model or stick my fingers together.
The base is in white strong and flexible polished - I haven't coated it with anything yet. The 'fractal peaks' part was produced in White strong and flexible (Shapeways kindly advised me that it couldn't be polished in their machine because the points would break off).
I put pictures on Shapeways here also (model page).
http://www.shapeways.com/model/356650/fractal_peaks_led_cand le_holder.html?key=e1cfd2e4d8c57eceaa042abc9da72fe2
[Updated on: Mon, 14 November 2011 02:06 UTC] unellenu.com
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #38539 is a reply to message #38510 ] Mon, 14 November 2011 15:41 UTC |
  |
|
Hi again,
BN has the consistency of talcum powder. It is very soft and chalky. It's not designed for your application here, it might even interfere with mold rubbers and it's also rather expensive.
Because of the tight and intricate surface of your fractal designs I see no way of sanding or polishing to an even finish. At best you will just be hitting the high points and if you go to far, detail will be lost. So, what is needed is an easily applied filler material that will fill in and bridge the tiny gaps between prominent features. You want something with a reasonably high build rate but not so thick that it will drown out surface features completely. CA glues, aka Super Glue works really well but you have already discovered it's drawbacks. Also because it is clear it makes it hard to know when enough is enough. The nice thing about CA's is that they cure to a hard surface which sands/polishes very nicely. So it's great for broad, essentially flat and smooth surfaces. But since your surfaces are anything but flat and smooth CA might be overkill. If you have already used it, then let er rip, as is, forget trying to sand it.
I think plain old "red"auto body primer (spray) would also work as a base coat to seal up the micro pores of your plastic prints. It goes on easily, is opaque and dries to a flat finish which makes it easy to see when enough has been applied. The primer could be followed by a clear coat of polyurethane (spray) which would leave a near mirror finish with NO sanding required. Presto, ready to pull a mold. Cost you about $10 for materials.
-G
"Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art."
Leonardo da Vinci
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #38781 is a reply to message #38721 ] Thu, 17 November 2011 22:36 UTC |
  |
|
Janelle,
I think any gloss spray should work doesn't really need to be a clear coat. To avoid drips & runs try to set up some indirect lighting so you can better see how even the coating goes on. Like the can sez, first apply a very light dust coat, wait a few minutes then apply a heavier coat as needed. 10 minutes between coats helps to prevent drips. Very exciting to see where this is heading!
-G
"Where the spirit does not work with the hand, there is no art."
Leonardo da Vinci
|
|
|
|
| Re: Shapeways models as masters for molds for fine porcelain [message #39148 is a reply to message #35788 ] Wed, 23 November 2011 18:43 UTC |
 |
|
Here is some of the feedback I received from the porcelain manufacturer about my finishing of the fractal model. Something gives me the impression that the manufacturer believes that I applied too much lacquer
Email 1:
This email was received from the manufacturer before I began the lacquering process.
'...... re a smooth surface, something i do if i am using wood and want a slick surface is to use crazy glue (cyanoacrylate) and coat the surface. then sand it with finer and finer sandpapers. i flood the surface with more crazy glue if there are some low spots. i finish by using ultrafine sandpaper and glycerine as a polishing medium. i get a highly polished surface. check to make sure it doesn't melt the WSF'
Email 2:
These two emails were received from the manufacturer after I emailed photographs of my lacquering work.
'i only ever told you to coat the base with crazy glue. to me it looks like the fractal peaks detail and personality has been utterly obliterated like an extreme face life where the face (the once had real personality) now looks like an over-inflated balloon or a china doll. the valleys are filled in with glue. if you lightly spray an area of it with a spray can of flat opaque gray primer paint you will see. if the 3d print doesn't melt, i would soak it in baths of acetone to remove most if not all of the glue. the surface of SWF has the look of coral which could have only enhanced the complexity of the porcelain cast. right now you are still seeing the detail albeit coated with clear hard molasses so you are not SEEing what has been obliterated. the earlier pretty pictures work because the glue is clear and the camera is still showing the detail under a coat of clear ice like after an 'ice storm' the trees are coated in slick smooth ice so the bark has been all filled in and the tree feels like smooth pipe. the mold will only reproduce the surface. and the surface has been smoothed to near non-existence with all that glue'.
Email 3:
'if there was any talk about crazy gluing the Fractal Peaks it was mainly in terms of reflectivity of the porcelain. i would say the best thing to do is to remove the bulk of the glue and then go in and JUDICIOUSLY spot in highlights and perhaps fill in some areas that bother you but don't douse it with clear liquid sugar which is what it looks like now. what makes it work is all the detail and you DONT want to lose that for whatever small gain you would have in shininess.'
[Updated on: Wed, 23 November 2011 18:43 UTC] unellenu.com
|
|
|