| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19455 is a reply to message #16979 ] Wed, 20 October 2010 17:27 UTC |
  |
|
I disagree, if say a coin were a 2 dimensional representation of a cylinder, flipped in 3D and 2D space, the inverse face has a different outcome. But much like here, you can not represent both outcomes in a 2D world. You either have heads or tails. In 3D you have a coin with both a heads and a tails.
The Mad Moder
michael@shapeways.com
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19456 is a reply to message #19455 ] Wed, 20 October 2010 18:26 UTC |
  |
|
there is arguments for both which is why i designed both. the d24 is not wrong either way. you can make a d3 by making a standard d6 with opposite faces equal to each other.
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19459 is a reply to message #19458 ] Wed, 20 October 2010 18:59 UTC |
  |
|
for the d48 i numbered as opossing faces of a cube add to 49. i also kept a patern to how i assigned.
for the d24 faces farthest away from each other add to 25. outer faces where numbered as a d6. intermediate faces were 3 apart on each plane.
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19460 is a reply to message #16979 ] Wed, 20 October 2010 18:59 UTC |
  |
|
ok now i need a Tylenol
http://www.3Dizingof.com
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19462 is a reply to message #16979 ] Wed, 20 October 2010 19:51 UTC |
  |
|
maybe this wont hurt as much
Hollow Die
Loaded Hollow Die
they look identical but they arent
Attachment: loaded.jpg
(Size: 19.93KB, Downloaded 838 time(s))
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19494 is a reply to message #19462 ] Thu, 21 October 2010 14:47 UTC |
  |
|
My brain has now leaked out of my ears. I hope you're happy.

Andy
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19495 is a reply to message #19494 ] Thu, 21 October 2010 14:50 UTC |
  |
|
sorry just thought a 4d die was the ultimate geek toy
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19592 is a reply to message #19590 ] Mon, 25 October 2010 04:06 UTC |
  |
|
|
Neat designs, but you do realize that the d12 is arguably the least used polyheadron in my experience.
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19607 is a reply to message #19592 ] Mon, 25 October 2010 13:13 UTC |
  |
|
what are the most common face counts?
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19616 is a reply to message #19613 ] Mon, 25 October 2010 15:54 UTC |
  |
|
Very nice. I'm not dissing your artistic endeavors, but I've already got one of your d12 and one by someone else, so with two I feel more than full up on d12s.
The only time in recent memory that I needed to roll a d12 in a game was after I informed and asshat of a gm that I didn't have a d12 yet in my metal collection. After I got them, I haven't needed them since!
Brian
a.k.a gumball
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19617 is a reply to message #19616 ] Mon, 25 October 2010 15:57 UTC |
  |
|
neither of those would roll fair. i don't think the second would even fall on a number.
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19653 is a reply to message #16979 ] Tue, 26 October 2010 12:31 UTC |
  |
|
your Cub octahedron D14 Dice gives me an idea...
The Mad Moder
michael@shapeways.com
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19657 is a reply to message #19616 ] Tue, 26 October 2010 14:31 UTC |
  |
|
| gumball wrote on Mon, 25 October 2010 15:54 |
The only time in recent memory that I needed to roll a d12 in a game was after I informed and asshat of a gm that I didn't have a d12 yet in my metal collection. After I got them, I haven't needed them since!
Brian
a.k.a gumball
|
Yeah, it's kind of a bummer that d12s seem to have the most options to play with from a geometry standpoint. So there are really cool d12s to make... but nobody needs them.
I guess we can always number them as d6s or d4s (or d2s or d3s for that matter. Yay for 12, the smallest abundant number), though that seems like cheating.
I'm probably going to keep coming out with d12s as interesting ones occur, usefulness be damned.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19677 is a reply to message #19673 ] Tue, 26 October 2010 19:09 UTC |
  |
|
your 'hinges' die has got the one opposite the two and 2 sixes opposite each other, but the Steampunk D6 die is very nice
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19679 is a reply to message #19678 ] Tue, 26 October 2010 19:43 UTC |
  |
|
I thought it was a cheater die!
If I had the cash right now I'd rush over and buy one!
Brian
a.k.a. gumball
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19900 is a reply to message #19899 ] Sun, 31 October 2010 03:48 UTC |
  |
|
|
@mctrivia: That will be awesome if it works. Be sure to show us pictures when your sample arrives. Great thinking!
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19901 is a reply to message #19899 ] Sun, 31 October 2010 08:32 UTC |
  |
|
Mctrivia,
That's a nice concept.
But what about simply doing a separate "load" (a cylinder or a cone with a hole) that fits between any fair face and the frame?
Just an idea.
[Updated on: Sun, 31 October 2010 08:32 UTC]
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19903 is a reply to message #19901 ] Sun, 31 October 2010 13:06 UTC |
  |
|
that is a great idea magic.
http://www.shapeways.com/model/171151/byod_steel_weigth.html
only makes sense if made of steel. Will shift center of gravity 3.2mm towards side with the weight.
Markup is only $0.05 until Wednesday in thanks for the great idea.
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19906 is a reply to message #19905 ] Sun, 31 October 2010 14:24 UTC |
  |
|
you have not made the design public
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19910 is a reply to message #19909 ] Sun, 31 October 2010 14:36 UTC |
  |
|
(10+8+4+2)/4 is indeed a 6 
It is designed with a frame whose wires are 3mm of diameter, so it is suitable for metal, by the way.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Designing dice for dice snobs [message #19989 is a reply to message #19972 ] Tue, 02 November 2010 21:43 UTC |
  |
|
Well that gave me an interesting idea. Standard cross is made up of quarters. So here is a cross die made that way. And always has been weighted to keep fair. However there is probably pretty good odds you may roll a corner occasionally. Will get 1 up later that will fix that.
Cross Die
[Updated on: Tue, 02 November 2010 21:46 UTC] Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/mctrivia or my blog at http://4ddice.blogspot.com/
|
|
|