|
| Re: Steel Ring - Vizor (defying the Stainless Steel rules) [message #7493 is a reply to message #7458 ] Tue, 27 October 2009 15:52 UTC |
  |
|
I think you're within initial specifications for steel. The 3mm wall-thickness limit only applies to "medium or large parts", whereas this ring is a small part (<50x50mm). Steel has higher resolution than WSF and is stronger, so presumably the minimum wall thickness is comparable for small parts, ~0.7mm.
Nice looking ring!
------------------
Elytra on Shapeways: http://www.shapeways.com/shops/elytra
|
|
|
|
| Re: Steel Ring - Vizor (defying the Stainless Steel rules) [message #12595 is a reply to message #7498 ] Sat, 08 May 2010 04:55 UTC |
  |
|
Your ring doesn't defy the stainless rules.
On the stainless steel information page it states a 3mm wall thickness for large objects but small objects below 50x50x50 mm almost all print successfully with wall thickness below 1 mm although they aren't specific on a precise minimum wall thickness.
(also things can often be thinner than wall thickness, it needs wall thickness on the supporting parts, e.g. a spike on the nose of a unicorn may not need to be equal or above min wall thickness at all as it carries no mayor weight.)
Very nice design.
I just thought I'd reply, many people tend to miss the part about small objects and wall thickness on the information page. I missed it myself the first time I checked.
Cheers!
edit fixing typo's
[Updated on: Sat, 08 May 2010 04:57 UTC]
|
|
|
| Re: Steel Ring - Vizor (defying the Stainless Steel rules) [message #12644 is a reply to message #7493 ] Mon, 10 May 2010 13:37 UTC |
  |
|
Nice looking ring!
I was a bit confused by the wall thickness thing... I guess I need to go back and read the specs.
Thanks for all the clarifying info.
Todd
www.4m3d.com
[Updated on: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:37 UTC]
|
|
|
|