This is great to hear, all the comments.
But... I am thinking we should have a little conversation as to how licensing deals will work as related to 3d printing specifically... meaning... for objects that are made only by 3D printing. (Most of my objects here on Shapeways can only be made via 3D printing).Licensing out design which can only be made by 3D printing - that's entirely different thing. You (the designer) are doing most of work there.
Reason I ask for you attention and maybe some time to talk (Skype? G+ Hangout... whatever.. new thread here may work too) is because I had some relatively bad experiences as far as that goes.
First... I was lucky enough to license few of my designs which are made by "ordinary" means (if I can call it that)... so... injection molding, laser cutting, casting.
For these... yes... there you deal with 5 - 10% royalty. Things went OK... Most rights are back in my hands now and now I am making them in numbers myself.... with a new company we set up in HK / China.
However... then there was a possibility of licensing deal with major 3Dprinting company with a design branch (Not Shapeways - no names mentioned here, you go figure
... who offered me something not much better than that "usual" percentage (it was like 7%)..... At which point I declined. And since then... I see that such contracts are not really getting any better.
It is one thing to license thing to manufacturer who will spend months to re-work the design so it can be made, most likely, in China... for fraction of a cost. Such (re-work) (and marketing they can provide) can be well worth giving up 95% or profit. That is lot of work.(in my case they worked for about 4 months for each product)
But in case of 3D printed objects that are specifically meant to be made that way (and can only be made that way)... this "manufacturer" will get 100% OK STL file from me (I make sure my stuff works for real)... and, you know... print it.... using exactly same machines.
So then... they have to do much less (or no work at all) to get it "manufactured". Marketing they can provide is still worth quite a decent chunk of profits... but not 93% of it. Not anymore. But, I am seeing such contracts are being given to inexperienced designers.
As 3Dpriting develops, more people will have this opportunity.
Us, designers, need to have discussion about this, and protect ourselves. I think this calls for fundamentally different deal. My question to you all, and discussion I would like to have is... what is fair amount percentage-wise? Is licensing even good thing to do in that case? What do you think? Some kind of iTunes model comes to mind... but keep in mind that Design industry is really entrenched in how things are done business-wise and Marketing wise. iTunes-like shop will give you zero visibility without dedicated marketers.
It's uncharted territory.
Best,
Igor | Alienology.com