Home » Support » Bug Reporting » Please improve the email feedback for models that don't pass
Search Search  
Show: Today's Messages    Show Polls    Message Navigator
Please improve the email feedback for models that don't pass [message #66133] Mon, 15 April 2013 08:00 UTC Go to next message
avatar rjdj  is currently offline rjdj
Messages: 2
Registered: April 2010
Go to my shop
Junior Member
It would be GREAT if you guys could just put a bug report or some kind of file check log in the email you send back when a part doesn't pass. The canned email doesnt really help much.

Hi ,

Uh oh! Seems like your model needs a bit more love before our robots can work their magic.

The 3D model MYMODEL you recently uploaded didn't pass all our automated checks, so it's not yet ready for 3D printing.

Our tutorials and FAQ can be super helpful for more detailed information, or you can always ask the community a specific question on our forum

If you're stuck or have any questions, don't hesitate to reach out at service@shapeways.com. Please include the file attached to the email, as well as any notes on your design, so we can help you solve your problem as quickly as possible.

Kind regards,

The Shapeways Service Team
Ralph, Maartje, Kevin, Christel, Joost, Michon, Mitchell and Gary
service@shapeways.com

Shapeways
Made in the future*
http://www.shapeways.com

[Updated on: Mon, 15 April 2013 20:22 UTC]

Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66143 is a reply to message #66133 ] Mon, 15 April 2013 14:30 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar AmLachDesigns  is currently offline AmLachDesigns
Messages: 1161
Registered: September 2011
Go to my shop
Senior Member
You are far from the first person to have complained about this, and over a long period of time nothing has changed.

This email is not helpful, at all.

As you imply, Shapeways knows why the part failed to upload, so why don't they tell us? As you have more experience you will start to have an idea as to the problem (usually thin walls/non-manifold object/non-connected parts etc) and set about fixing it yourself, but as a communication this email falls far short of what SW normally do.

[Updated on: Mon, 15 April 2013 14:32 UTC]

Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66147 is a reply to message #66143 ] Mon, 15 April 2013 15:28 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar mkroeker  is currently offline mkroeker
Messages: 1614
Registered: June 2012
Go to all my models
Senior Member
As shapeways cannot possibly benefit from intentionally unclear error messages, I can only assume that
the problem may be that the third-party software used for the automatic checking simply does not (no longer?)
return specific error codes.
Still I agree that the dude-speak "more love" phrase can be very infuriating - it may have been a cute in-joke
for a geeky startup where everybody knew the handful of customers in person, but it could drive away would-be
customers now.
How about removing this sentence, and adding a more helpful "This could mean that your model
has no thickness, or that it contains overlapping or misoriented parts or consists of more than 1 million triangles"
between the "...not yet ready for 3D printing" and "Our tutorials..." ?

Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66771 is a reply to message #66147 ] Wed, 24 April 2013 08:37 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar sforsyth  is currently offline sforsyth
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2013
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Agreed, it's actually quite infuriating to post models and not have the slightest idea why it failed. Presumably the software that checked the integrity of the model generated a fail report, why not provide a link to that report for users interested in the specifics of the fail?

This is still very new to a lot of people, so identifying the problems for them is going to minimize the amount of uploads, checks, and back and forth of emails.

I'd also really encourage a notification for models uploaded which are over the 64Gb limit (or better again, refusing to upload it in the first place with a warning!). Currently, I don't get a notification saying the upload failed because of the file size, I get no feedback whatsoever, leading me to believe my upload simply failed. I uploaded the same 70MB model 3 times yesterday because of this before I realized my mistake. I'm sure I'm not the only person with this problem.
Seán
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66778 is a reply to message #66771 ] Wed, 24 April 2013 09:43 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar AmLachDesigns  is currently offline AmLachDesigns
Messages: 1161
Registered: September 2011
Go to my shop
Senior Member
In general I think that once you have been using SW a while you get to know how the system operates a bit and you can solve problems yourself/figure up how you ****ed up etc., but I think SW relies on this a little too much with the associated risk of scaring new users away.

I remember when I started having these problems and getting either non-useful messages or none at all as you describe and getting very frustrated. Only through stubborness did I perservere.

We are talking about data files here, and computers, and there is no excuse in my opinion for not getting better feedback at all stages of the process. If SW really wants to continue to be (imo) the best site it should cater for (i.e. notify of):

- files size too big;
- too many polygons;
- part size too big/too small;
- thin walls/wires;
- too thick (ceramics);

None of these should require guesswork or extended conversations with SW user support.


Also, while we're are at it, we know software exists that gives wall thickness maps, so why not use this in the verification/notification of errors instead of the often misused Netfabb?
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66780 is a reply to message #66778 ] Wed, 24 April 2013 10:22 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar sforsyth  is currently offline sforsyth
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2013
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Yeah, my stubbornness is beginning to wear thin, that's my problem. I'm using the exact same technique to hollow out two different models, and whereas the first one works, the second doesn't, and I have no way of finding out why. Especially infuriating since they've checked it, know the problem, and have just decided not to tell me the reason. Don't want to be included in those new users being scared away, just sending me the failure report would go a long way to preventing that from happening.
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66787 is a reply to message #66780 ] Wed, 24 April 2013 12:07 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar AmLachDesigns  is currently offline AmLachDesigns
Messages: 1161
Registered: September 2011
Go to my shop
Senior Member
Well, as someone else posted somewhere else (is that vague enough?) probably the problem is that they have automated checks that do NOT tell the the reason, just pass or fail. My point is that they SHOULD have systems that give better feedback. Perhaps that 30 million could come in handy...

For your model that's not working, what software? Have you already checked for the usual: size, non-manifold, normals?
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66788 is a reply to message #66787 ] Wed, 24 April 2013 12:16 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar sforsyth  is currently offline sforsyth
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2013
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Yeah, I'm gonna count that as suitably vague thanks. Smile
I'd be very surprised if any software performing specific checks can't give the results of those checks. As in, failed because of found non-manifold faces, incorrect surface normals, etc. I mean, it seems inconceivable to me that anyone would perform a series of checks and not be able to tell you which of them failed.
As for the model itself, I'm using ZBrush and relying on the Dynamesh and Shell functions to hollow out my models. It's worked on numerous models so far, and then suddenly with the latest model it fails every time. Guess I need to investigate other tools to tell me about my mesh integrity.
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66790 is a reply to message #66788 ] Wed, 24 April 2013 12:23 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar AmLachDesigns  is currently offline AmLachDesigns
Messages: 1161
Registered: September 2011
Go to my shop
Senior Member
Netfabb works for a lot of people.

Myself, I use Blender. To make a hollow model is simple:
- delete a face or faces;
- use Solidify Modifier to required thickness.

There's some more details but that's the essence. I don't know if you have Blender (it's free) but you can import in several formats and do this if your other method doesn't pan out.

Good luck!
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66792 is a reply to message #66790 ] Wed, 24 April 2013 12:26 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar sforsyth  is currently offline sforsyth
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2013
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Yeah, cheers for that. Unfortunately, it's a bit more complicated than that for me. The model is quite complex, so hollowing i out in Blender, Max or Maya isn't really an option. I've just tried downloading MeshLabs, and it's a bit overwhelming without tutorials, so might check out Netfabb too, cheers!
icon8.gif  Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66833 is a reply to message #66792 ] Thu, 25 April 2013 02:41 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Soham  is currently offline Soham
Messages: 2
Registered: April 2013
Go to all my models
Junior Member
I am trying to upload my first model, I've sent many versions at this point, each time painstakingly trying something new, regenerating the model, and getting the same useless message.

First it was too big, okay, they document that, I fixed it. Then it had too many polygons still, once again, that's a documented issue and I was able to discover that and fix it.

Then I investigated more and it seemed like it might be an inverted normals problem. I fixed that, still doesn't work.

I am out of ideas here!

Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66836 is a reply to message #66833 ] Thu, 25 April 2013 04:52 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar stonysmith  is currently offline stonysmith
Messages: 1874
Registered: August 2008
Go to my shop
Senior Member
moderator
Your file has 980k+ triangles. That's still pushing close to the limit for max triangles and may be causing a timeout in the automated process.
For one thing, the bottom side doesn't need to have near as many facets as you have on it. The bottom _could_ have only two triangles instead of the several hundred that you have there.

What material are you wishing to print this in?
It's going to be more than $100 at this size in Sandstone and considerably more in any of the other materials..
http://stonysmith.com/wired/VolumeEstimator.asp?L=127&W= 95&H=11&T=0

Your triangle faces are approx. 0.15mm on a side. You could probably increase that to 0.2mm to 0.3mm with no major loss in fidelity of the image, while at the same time dropping the triangle count significantly.


Patience, Persistance, Politeness - the 3Ps will help us get us to Perfect Printed Products
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #66837 is a reply to message #66836 ] Thu, 25 April 2013 04:56 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Soham  is currently offline Soham
Messages: 2
Registered: April 2013
Go to all my models
Junior Member
I did end up making it smaller and I converted back to ASCII stl instead of binary. For some reason that worked. I'm planning to print in the super high detail frosted plastic I guess, if I can afford it, but the total with the new files I uploaded is coming to 118, so I am not quite sure what I want to do yet.
Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #67570 is a reply to message #66833 ] Mon, 06 May 2013 21:44 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar PDaniel  is currently offline PDaniel
Messages: 2
Registered: May 2013
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Mmmm.. in 3ds max there's a modifier useful for you cuz reduce the polygon number keeping the ecence. Smile
But at least you get a notification, I upload a model 2 ays ago and it's sill processing Rolling Eyes

Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #67775 is a reply to message #66788 ] Fri, 10 May 2013 12:17 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar stop4stuff  is currently offline stop4stuff
Messages: 3109
Registered: June 2010
Go to my shop
Senior Member
@sforsyth - The usual issue that Sculptris causes is internal bobbling to the model, this generally happens with very tight creases (the surface will turn inside out, cross over and bobble in the inside of the shell). When this situation occurs, Shapeways' MeshMedic checking software (and NetFabb Cloud) gets confused as to what faces should be on the outside and fail the model. The solution is to used MeshLab's remove intersecting faces function, repair the holes left (can be done in NetFabb), send the model through NetFabb Cloud service which should remove all of the left over internal parts.

You can find out if the model has internal bobbling by slicing it open in NetFabb.

Paul



Re: Please improve the email feedback for models what don't pass [message #67778 is a reply to message #67775 ] Fri, 10 May 2013 13:08 UTC Go to previous message
avatar sforsyth  is currently offline sforsyth
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2013
Go to my shop
Junior Member
Thanks Paul, it was actually ZBrush I was using, not Sculptris, but I suppose the same applies. Nettfabb seems to fix most of my problems.
Thanks again!
S

 
   
Previous Topic:Waiting more than "some minutes" and no feedback...
Next Topic:Wrong volume calculation and prices ?

Logo

Hello.

We're sorry to inform you that we no longer support this browser and can't confirm that everything will work as expected. For the best Shapeways experience, please use one of the following browsers:

Click anywhere outside this window to continue.