Home » Community » General Discussion » expanding production facilities
Search Search  
Show: Today's Messages    Show Polls    Message Navigator
expanding production facilities [message #61326] Mon, 04 February 2013 16:11 UTC Go to next message
avatar victorrings  is currently offline victorrings
Messages: 57
Registered: June 2012
Go to my shop
Member
a thought occurred to me the other day when i was pondering the fact that i am going to have to wait a whole month for my order to come in- what is the time table for further expansion of Shapeways production facilities. it occurred to me that in those thoughts that maybe the creation of Shapeways first non European production facility being in NEW YORK might not be the best idea. i came to this idea with 2 reasons: price and shipping.
price-
there is a great deal of overhead when dealing with working in NEW YORK... form the higher cost of living to the inclusion of a state income tax.
shipping-
even though, i am sure, UPS takes care of the shipping network, there has to be some sort of discount for shipping a product to and from the middle of the country as opposed to the extreme east coast.

with that being said...i can definitely understand the reasoning behind choosing NEW YORK as the first foray into the American production facilities. not least of which is exposure. there is no place on earth that will get more attention than NEW YORK.

now i would like to make a proposal for the future expansion of production facilities... 4 options in fact that might be considered to balance the facility in NEW YORK. starting in the North and heading south:

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma-
pro: centrally located for shipping (there is a large UPS shipping hub in the city), low taxes, low cost of living.
con: low profile, lack of trained workforce

Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas-
pro: centrally located, large number of inexpensive facilities available, lower cost of living, No state income tax, large metropolitan area, larger base of trained workforce.
con: all of the drawbacks of living in suburban sprawl.

Austin, Texas
pro: centrally located, expanding metropolitan area ripe for emerging technologies and cutting edge creativity, large and varied workforce, tremendous growth potential.
con: emerging signs of big city problems

Mexico
pro: centrally located for the Americas, super low production and facility costs, steady workforce, growth potential
con: lack of trained workforce, potential for civil unrest, unreliable shipping solutions

alright... that is my proposal. i would love to hear thoughts on what i wrote and maybe even alternate ideas on the way you think Shapeways should proceed. maybe even more global expansion... imagine if Shapeways expanded into JAPAN or CHINA... that would be totally cool...


my website is online at
http://victorrings.weebly.com/
RINGS GALORE!
Re: expanding production facilities [message #61331 is a reply to message #61326 ] Mon, 04 February 2013 17:09 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar stonysmith  is currently offline stonysmith
Messages: 1865
Registered: August 2008
Go to my shop
Senior Member
moderator
+200 for Dallas <grin>
And there's no real need to deal with suburban sprawl here. There are plenty of available (and cheaper) buildings much closer to the 'burbs. You don't HAVE to operate downtown.

Come on down ya'll!


Patience, Persistance, Politeness - the 3Ps will help us get us to Perfect Printed Products
Re: expanding production facilities [message #61333 is a reply to message #61326 ] Mon, 04 February 2013 17:15 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar mkroeker  is currently offline mkroeker
Messages: 1600
Registered: June 2012
Go to all my models
Senior Member
Is shipping really the time-determining step ? I would rather expect it to be sheer capacity, as the printing process itself is slow.
Also I doubt that the US are that promising a market to warrant locating more production sites there - for global coverage, my bet is on sheepways.nz Smile
Re: expanding production facilities [message #61359 is a reply to message #61333 ] Mon, 04 February 2013 21:26 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar Bathsheba  is currently offline Bathsheba
Messages: 325
Registered: August 2008
Go to my shop
Senior Member
I suppose the reasoning was that if the guys have to move to the US, they want to live in New York. It would have made sense to locate in Omaha, but you don't change the world by making sense. (Our thesis is that you change it by having fun.)

Or by being China. The whole thing is going to change again when this hits China.

I agree that shipping may not really be the problem. 3DP isn't currently well adapted to banging out a lot of parts fast. The trouble is that you want the machines to run 24-7 to get your investment out of them, but they have fixed capacity. So you end up splitting the difference between "enough capacity to handle busy times" and "idle machines at other times", and backlogs become business as usual. This isn't a complaint: it's just the way things are with fixed throughput and bursty workload.

[Updated on: Mon, 04 February 2013 21:32 UTC]


-Bathsheba
http://bathsheba.com
Re: expanding production facilities [message #61360 is a reply to message #61359 ] Mon, 04 February 2013 22:02 UTC Go to previous messageGo to next message
avatar victorrings  is currently offline victorrings
Messages: 57
Registered: June 2012
Go to my shop
Member
BUT... in Dallas- the girls are sooo much prettier!

yes... China and Japan are the traditional progression of how technologies flow- but 3d printing is unique. it doesn't necessarily benefit greatly by having a huge, well educated, dedicated workforce. this is the major advantage for China. my hypothesis is that increasing production only increases workforce by a fraction.

so what can be done?
price control what you can. shipping, labor costs, and efficiency are all aspects of the process that can be improved upon.

as for where in the world this process is going- it all starts in the AMERICAs without a doubt. you sell it to America and everyone else will follow suit.

c


my website is online at
http://victorrings.weebly.com/
RINGS GALORE!
Re: expanding production facilities [message #61373 is a reply to message #61360 ] Tue, 05 February 2013 02:26 UTC Go to previous message
avatar PeregrineStudios  is currently offline PeregrineStudios
Messages: 291
Registered: September 2012
Go to my shop
Senior Member
There's also the fact that while the U.S. is not central geometrically, it is central economically. I think it'd be a lot easier to ship worldwide from New York than it would to ship from Mexico.

 
   
Previous Topic:How things are printed
Next Topic:How the printer works?

Logo

Hello.

We're sorry to inform you that we no longer support this browser and can't confirm that everything will work as expected. For the best Shapeways experience, please use one of the following browsers:

Click anywhere outside this window to continue.