|
| Re: USA Necklace Pendant [message #39661 is a reply to message #39640 ] Thu, 01 December 2011 13:50 UTC |
  |
|
Just an idea, but what about individual states?
The Mad Moder
michael@shapeways.com
|
|
|
| Re: USA Necklace Pendant [message #39663 is a reply to message #39640 ] Thu, 01 December 2011 14:18 UTC |
  |
|
Great idea!
Not a pendant wearer myself, but I vaguely remember being told that some people prefer a top loop to a back loop. Something to do with how they hang? Perhaps others on the forum who do jewellery designing (and aren't relying on a patchy memory!) can advise. If so, then two options would be fairly simple to sort out?
Have you thought of using data from a bit further away?
How about the NASA radar recorded terrain of Mars, or Lunar craters?
Andrew
|
|
|
| Re: USA Necklace Pendant [message #39807 is a reply to message #39663 ] Sun, 04 December 2011 18:24 UTC |
  |
|
Thanks for the great ideas!
@ancientbuzzard
You are right, some people prefer the hook in other places or hooks of other shapes. We decided to upload this variant, but we'd happily make a customized version for anybody who contacts us. The minimum feature size of 3mm on stainless steel reduces the options quite drastically...
Lunar and Martian landscapes are possible, but getting exact data about country borders from moon and Mars is difficult! Jokes aside, the data exists and I have seen people create objects from it. Not sure where that was, maybe Thingiverse?
@Youknowwho4eva
Yep, we are planning to do individual states. Colorado and Wyoming will be the easiest to make
|
|
|
| Re: USA Necklace Pendant [message #39878 is a reply to message #39640 ] Tue, 06 December 2011 17:16 UTC |
  |
|
I'm not really sure how fast or complex your method is but would it not be simpler to use a silhouette of the desired geography? I know you're also getting the terrain height included but how accurate is it at that scale anyway?
Glenn
Glenn ------ My Website Third Dimension Jewellery
|
|
|
| Re: USA Necklace Pendant [message #40072 is a reply to message #39878 ] Sat, 10 December 2011 18:12 UTC |
 |
|
I like this idea and how it turned out a lot!
For the stainless versions, have you considered cutting a channel into the back of the pendant where the eyelet goes? You can probably inset the eyelet about 1.5mm or so doing that on your thicker models to reduce the volume/cost and reduce how much the eyelet sticks out the back.
Looking forward to seeing what else you come up with
[Updated on: Sat, 10 December 2011 18:13 UTC]
|
|
|