| Why more expensive than should be? [message #18566] Wed, 29 September 2010 23:04 UTC |
 |
|
|
Just for example, this model ( http://www.shapeways.com/model/159074/mac_pigment_tray.html? gid=rg) is 8.56cm3 in volume, so in WSF it should be (1.5 + (1.5 * 8.56)) = $14.34. But actually it comes out to $17.06 basic cost. I was just wondering why this is. Thanks.
|
|
|
| Re: Why more expensive than should be? [message #18569 is a reply to message #18566 ] Thu, 30 September 2010 01:10 UTC |
 |
|
|
You forgot the VAT 14.34 * 1.19 = 17.06
|
|
|
| Re: Why more expensive than should be? [message #18571 is a reply to message #18569 ] Thu, 30 September 2010 01:28 UTC |
|
|
|
But for me, it shows the price as $16.38 (or €12.79), excluding VAT (which doesn't apply in my case, anyway). Why?!
|
|
|
| Re: Why more expensive than should be? [message #18574 is a reply to message #18571 ] Thu, 30 September 2010 07:58 UTC |
|
|
| GHP wrote on Thu, 30 September 2010 01:28 |
But for me, it shows the price as $16.38 (or €12.79), excluding VAT (which doesn't apply in my case, anyway). Why?!
|
That would be either because you're not logged in and we don't know your country, or you're logged in and you're from a non-EU country. In those cases you'll see the price without VAT.
Bart
Community Manager Europe | Shapeways
|
|
|
| Re: Why more expensive than should be? [message #18575 is a reply to message #18574 ] Thu, 30 September 2010 08:03 UTC |
|
|
|
Actually, I was puzzled because Aquillyne says that the price without VAT should be $14.34 (and the calculation appears to be accurate), but I'm seeing the price as $16.38 (also without VAT). Maybe the model has been updated? I can't see whether the volume has changed.
|
|
|
| Re: Why more expensive than should be? [message #18580 is a reply to message #18575 ] Thu, 30 September 2010 08:58 UTC |
|
|
Ah sorry, I misunderstood. I see $16.38 excl. VAT as well. The model has probably been updated, yes.
Bart
Community Manager Europe | Shapeways
|
|
|
Search
