|
| Re: Inventing the Wheel... [message #10296 is a reply to message #10295 ] Sun, 28 February 2010 18:17 UTC |
  |
|
Hi
I think it would work fine without the wheel. much simpler that way with less moving parts.
you could add a steering rail, for the axis to follow as it moves along the surface.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Inventing the Wheel... [message #10307 is a reply to message #10295 ] Mon, 01 March 2010 13:28 UTC |
|
|
Any wheel spinning on a axis would have friction. Be interesting to find a lube that works for wsf.
The Mad Moder
michael@shapeways.com
|
|
|
|
| Re: Inventing the Wheel... [message #10330 is a reply to message #10325 ] Mon, 01 March 2010 21:15 UTC |
|
|
Thank you very much for your replies. I will follow your advice and keep it simple.
Actually, apart from the magnets (probably not easy to realize), the only thing that could be better than the axis in direct contact with the surface would be the bearing (because in this case I think that all is rolling without slipping so there is no friction, or more exactly the friction helps the different parts rolling).
But I have little room in this design, so the choice is easy to do 
Magic
PS: I was reading my first post and the expression I used - "a world where all is in White Strong and Flexible" - made me dream... Say the mankind, instead of inventing fire, would have invented first the 3D printing in White Strong and Flexible, how would our world be today? The wheels would probably be triangular (with a vertex pointing downward) because they do not need to roll: the road, the wheels and the axes of the wheels are in WSF, so the friction would be the same... Hmmm. Interesting. Or may be not. 
|
|
|
| Re: Inventing the Wheel... [message #10333 is a reply to message #10295 ] Mon, 01 March 2010 22:00 UTC |
|
|
hmmm
in larger cases, even if the road was WSF and the wheel was WSF, a wheel would be better because there is still a huge amount of fricion between 2 points. with a triangular wheel, you would (more than likely) wear that triangle out very quickly. Whereas a wheel, distributes (if thats the right word..) the friction over a different area.
I feel like i should know the technical terms that make a wheel better than a stationary bearing, but i dont right now. But unless you have a very low friction surface like snow or ice, a wheel will work far better than a stationary bearing.
Aut Viam Inveniam Aut Faciam
Check out http://JakeDrews.Com and http://WondrousWidgets.Com for more designs by Jake!
|
|
|
| Re: Inventing the Wheel... [message #10336 is a reply to message #10333 ] Tue, 02 March 2010 00:15 UTC |
|
|
|
I'm not sure about the friction, but the wheel has a big advantage as far as rolling over small items and surface defects. A sliding axle will be stopped by bumps and grooves or carpeting, but the wheel rolls onward.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Inventing the Wheel... [message #10414 is a reply to message #10400 ] Wed, 03 March 2010 21:45 UTC |
|
|
Ah OK. I though you wanted to use magnets to reduce the friction. I better understand now.
For the bearing I think that the spheres are rolling without slipping (so they are rolling on themselves but also moving around the axis). As long as WSF do not slip against WSF I guess there should be no friction issue. It is as if you put a cylinder on a table (so that it can roll), a book on the cylinder and you move the book relatively to the table: even if the cylinder has a lot of friction (that is: it cannot slip on the table but just roll and it cannot slip on the book either), the book can move freely relatively to the table (in one direction though).
Rawkstar320 and Gibell: you are right except if the Wheel is not a rolling wheel but a non-moving wheel (our ancestors would have certainly invented the wheel this way, since making the wheel roll would have just displaced the friction problem to the axis)
[Updated on: Wed, 03 March 2010 21:45 UTC]
|
|
|
Search
Inventing the Wheel...
, so I try to make it short: is the invention of the wheel useful in a world where all is in White Strong and Flexible?
), I was wondering if it was really more efficient than having the axis of the wheel in direct contact with the "ground", even if it does not turn.
