Building Large Stuff

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by 184153_deleted, Aug 8, 2012.

  1. Need some advice concerning Large structures. Lets assume i want to fill the entire bounding box of WSF using as little material as possible and making a structure that has at the same time maximum stability from a vertical vector (gravity).

    I've been doing some research into this and the shukhov tower seems like the best candidate.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shukhov_Tower


    So hypothetically speaking, very roughly how much weight can i put onto such a structure (see attachment) before it breaks?

    I know its hard question, i am not looking for specifics, just some very vague boundaries. Lets say the wires are 1mm thick, and there are many (64) of them.

    1kg 5kg 10kg 20kg ?

    if all of this is to outlandish, then let me simplify, instead of the shukov hyperboloid lets just have a simple tube, 60cm high 35 cm in diameter, and a wall thickness of 1mm. Lets increase stability by slightly coning it towards the top.

    Now same question, roughly, how much kg can i carefully place on top of it ?
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 8, 2012
  2. stonysmith
    stonysmith Well-Known Member Moderator
    If I may, let me give you an indirect (non-scientific) answer...

    My train layout is 0.75 by 1 meter and weighs about 7kg

    I designed this bridge and printed it in Alumide.
    BridgeBalasted.jpg
    The model is here: http://shpws.me/3Ugk

    All the struts are 2mm thick. The bridge is 5cm wide and 4cm tall, 18cm long. It is anchored to my layout with a product called Liquid Nails.

    I can pull up on the bridge, and lift the entire layout without deforming the bridge in any manner.
     
  3. stannum
    stannum Well-Known Member
    1mm thickness is only allowed for small things and it's really flexible anyway, it would crumble. There is a calculator for this and you would have to use 3.6mm for 600mm long (Anybody knows how do you reach that page with the new site redesign?)

    Also you have take into account the different behavior against comprension and extension, vibrations, impact... Someone built a part for a RC, it broke under use. Lacking analysis software, only way is build and test.
     
  4. stop4stuff
    stop4stuff Well-Known Member
    The link was on the Materials Comparison Page until I pointed out that was the only link to the 'big parts calculator' via the feedback forum ( https://www.shapeways.com/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=10390& amp;start=0&), after which it was removed :confused

     
  5. thanks, anybody know any software that can display the parts of a model that are exposed to the most stress ?

    Also, i would like to reapeat my question, a tube with a wall of 3,6mm, diameter 35cm, hight 60cm, how much weight can i put on it ?
     
  6. stop4stuff
    stop4stuff Well-Known Member
  7. BillBedford
    BillBedford Member
    I think both your hollow cone and a Shukhov tower will fail by buckling if loaded vertically - and that is a much more difficult calculation than straight tension/compression. You need to build models and experiment.
     
  8. i agree its just thats its an expensive undertaking and i am trying to gather as much data as possible before experimentation.

    For instance i could make a pole in the middle of the shukhov tower and connect it with multiple wires to the outer shell every 10 cm of height to prevent buckling.

    I still have to figure out how i am supposed to use the data from the material specifications on all of this, i am unfortunately not a static expert and my math is weak at best.

    But thanks to everyone for their input.

    If anybody could tell me at least how much weight i could hang on a 1mm thick wire without it ripping, it would give me a good estimate of its properties without complex math. So if anybody from shapeways is reading this, maybe if you have some spare time in maybe you could do this experiment, you know in the name of science :)
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2012
  9. stonysmith
    stonysmith Well-Known Member Moderator
    From the MSDS above.. it says that PA220 has a tensile strength of 6962 psi (lb/in) - that translates to 10.8 lb/mm2

    The problem here is that you're not "stretching" the item, but rather compressing it... the weight comes from above, and the compressive strength is not listed on the MSDS.

    You may be able to get a better number from the Flexural Strength which is 8412 psi or 13 lb/mm2

    As to the tower "strength".. In over-simplified terms, if the side angle of the tower is 20 degrees, then the force to cause a bend is reduced by 20/90. In otherwords, a tilted beam would only support 13*(1-20/90) or 10.1 lb/mm2. This discounts (slightly) the effect of having the rings at each level of the tower.. those rings cause the number to go back up a bit.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2012
  10. so roughly 4,5 kg per mm2 ?

    that sounds like a lot, if that is true then thats an impressive material, of course this only tells us the weight under which it would break / rip and not as you mentioned the whole compression / bending thing, still impressive.

    I can work with that, thanks.
     
  11. Phxman
    Phxman Member
    Bill, I see you are confident is using your 3-Link & Instanta couplings in situations under tension for 4mm scale. What deliberate failure points have you pressed them to? Noel