Introducing 14k Gold, read more on the blog.

The Shapeways Blog: 3D Printing News & Innovation

Shapeways Blog


Announcing the Winner of the Design for iPhone 5 Contest (VIDEO)


Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

This is just a copy a the famous "Maille case" Designed by Janne Kyttanen : http://www.freshfiber.com/products/

Not very original...
#1 Jack44 on 2012-11-02 19:36 (Reply)
Yes, this is not fair for a contest!
#2 Bamsto4 on 2012-11-02 20:28 (Reply)
Hi Jack44 and Bamsto4,

The concept of a 'Sweater' with woven threads is somewhat different to chain maille, which is interlocking parts. One is somewhat feminine in nature, the other has masculine overtones of armor and war.

The sweater concept is carried through from style, description and presentation renders with a ball of yarn and the sweet byline of 'handmade by robots'.

This is what makes a solid entry to a conceptual contest.

That being said I was not aware of the chain maille design so perhaps it is not so famous.
I see the similarity with the movement but watching both videos there is also differences with threads with memory versus loose parts that shake and are not held in place.
#3 Duann on 2012-11-02 21:30 (Reply)
Lol!
If you don't know who is Janne Kyttanen, I think you should read a little more about design and 3D printing. Because he's famous (also for 3D printing) and for his cases also.
This kind of cases are known and available since 3-4 years on 3D printing technology for everyone.
Both, sweater and maille exist for phone case and looks like exactly to this case.
Maybe you didn't know before to see this case but this is just a copy. Not a personal conception which deserve to win (Entry must be a new design uploaded after September 13th, 2012.).
I think this case won because of a lack of knowledge in design about the people who has judged. And this can be understood of course. Because, we can not be aware of everything!
#4 Jack44 on 2012-11-02 21:56 (Reply)
Where is your entry jack44?
#5 Anon44 on 2012-11-03 01:02 (Reply)
I don't have any entry? Why?
#6 Jack44 on 2012-11-03 01:32 (Reply)
I'm just a buyer.
#7 Jack44 on 2012-11-03 01:35 (Reply)
Hey Jack44, just chill. Its not the end of the world. Not everyone can keep tabs on the works and designs of every designer on the planet either, its unrealistic to expect as much.

Congrats to the winner!
#8 Alex Delderfield (ADEdge) (Homepage) on 2012-11-03 14:08 (Reply)
Hi Alex Delderfield,

I just said this is not fair because this model already exists. The winner don't have an original model.
Of course nobody can know all of the designs of every designer. But for a contest on iPhone 5 accessories, a little research on existing models is easy to do.
It wasn't the case for this contest.
It's a shame for the other participant, I think.
#9 Jack44 on 2012-11-03 14:24 (Reply)
Duann has already explained to you how they differ. So I wont bother going over it again. What youre seeing is not a direct copy, but a similar concept - something which is hard to avoid.

Either way, I'm sure the shapeways team sees tons of different iphone covers coming though their printers, they know something of quality when they see it, and so this iphone case was deemed to be the winner.
#10 Alex Delderfield (ADEdge) (Homepage) on 2012-11-03 14:29 (Reply)
Maybe Jack44 didn't say anything, because I saw this case : https://d2t1xqejof9utc.cloudfront.net/screenshots/pics/40acfdab2c5ab7467a61de0b19344488/original.JPG .

The man who made this case said that's an update of iPhone4/4S case (design by Janne Kyttanen).
This model is available on grabcad.com
#11 KnowoneE3 on 2012-11-04 01:37 (Reply)
My comment was deleted!!!
I said that, indeed this case suspiciously looks like to the winner case!
We cannot speak freely here?!
#12 Firesteel on 2012-11-05 15:14 (Reply)
Hey Firesteel,

Your comment was deleted along with a whole bunch of spam comments with no email address.

I have locked this comment so it will remain.

If you honestly believe the contest was rigged, and really wish to discuss this you are free to contact me duann at shapeways dot com.
#12.1 Duann on 2012-11-05 15:23 (Reply)
I didn't know the Janne Kyttanen case for iPhone(s) before. But the winner case is near ("exactly") the same. I just read again the contest rules and it is written : "Entry must be a new design uploaded after September 13th, 2012." .

When we honestly compare the Janne Kyttanen case to the winner case, we can't say that's an original design, obviously. (http://grabcad.com/library/iphone-5-maile-sweater)
This seems strange.

How did you choose the winner. Is there a note to a scale that allowed you to compare different entries?

All these things make it seem suspicious.
#13 Firesteel on 2012-11-05 15:46 (Reply)
Hi Firesteel,

We looked at all of the entries as a team and picked a few that we all really liked based on the design.

We then 3D printed a few of them to make sure they worked and get a real feel for them.
Everyone who saw this design, picked it up and played with oohs and aahs. This is a team that see MANY 3D printed iPhone accessories coming through our 3D printers every day. So for a design to get this response from so many people means it hase something special.

I have never seen any of ArtizanWork's designs prior to the contest, no one from the team has ever met, emailed or had any communications with ArtizanWork prior to notifying them that they have won.

I am curious to know which one you think should have won the contest?
#13.1 Duann on 2012-11-05 16:00 (Reply)
Hey Firesteel

this a design uploaded after the contest on November 3?

That looks suspicious to me.
#13.2 Duann on 2012-11-05 16:19 (Reply)
I think you don't really understand what I mean and also what jack44 said.
It's not about what I prefer in the contest or what you subjectively like.

It's about the fact that the winner made a copy of an existing design. This is not an original design and it's out of the contest objectively.
It's just about the rules, the facts and the other entries.
This is not fair and objective.
And the winner didn't respect the rules or didn't know the original case before.

And finally the judgement wasn't based on marks or objective rules...
#14 Firesteel on 2012-11-05 16:18 (Reply)
I think Duann et al. at Shapeways chose well.

As a designer, the difference between the disputed designs is very clear to me. Further, I trust the folks at Shapeways to recognize a quality printed model when they see one.

Congrats on the win, artizanwork!
#15 Marcus on 2012-11-06 16:55 (Reply)
By the way, Shapeways, please don't let this put you off having another contest...
#16 Glenn (Homepage) on 2012-11-08 18:21 (Reply)

Add Comment



Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

  
  
The Shapeways Blog: 3D Printing News & Innovation

Learn More »