Professor George Hart is a rapid
prototyping pioneer. Back when Shapeways was years
away from being an idea and the technology was in its infancy and only used by
Universities and big corporates for R&D he was already making
art on 3D printers.
In addition to being a sculptor he is a Mathematician, a
Computer Science Professor at Stony Brook University and has
published academically on topics ranging from education,
puzzles, cryptography, linear algebra to engineering. Be sure to stop
by his site.
But, as you might be able to determine from the picture of his office,
his truest love is geometry.
How do you approach your rapid prototyping art?
My mind is full of forms screaming to get out. Unfortunately, there is
no time for me to get to them all. I try to give the most worthy ones
the gift of existence, but there are so many material things one must
attend to. Additive fabrication helps me considerably in the process.
I hope viewers can see some of what I see in my works.
What do you teach at Stony Brook?
I teach a range of courses including some on computer-aided sculpture
and algorithms for 3D design. As far
as I know, my Computers and Sculpture class is the only course in the
universe specifically about the various ways in which computer technology
is applied to sculpture.
Why the fascination for three dimensional space?
We are stuck in a 3D universe and we have evolved to perceive and enjoy
its richness. Sculpture helps one appreciate both the possibilities
and the limitations of space.
What is your Encyclopedia of polyhedra?
That is web resource I wrote to systematize a great deal of information
about polyhedra, including so
me mathematical gems and an appreciation
for their history and beauty. It is illustrated with 3D models in
VRML, which was the state of the art in the mid 1990s when I wrote it,
but the technology is a bit dated now. I’d like to find a student to
do a project converting everything a more modern format.
What 3D software tools do you use?
I use many different tools, but commercial software doesn’t have
features I need for the kinds of
mathematical structures that interest
me. So mostly I write my own 3D sculpture CAD tools, which I then use
in design. This makes me want new features, so I am constantly varying
and editing my software.
Would you recommend any of them?
The tools I write are just for me. Nothing is stable or documented for
release. I’m mainly interested in producing actual sculptures, and the
software tools are just one of many steps along
What kind of person would you recommend the software tool Mathematica to?
To use it well, you need some mathematical maturity, an understanding
of basic software concepts such as recursion, and means to get a copy
inexpensively. I expect it is far too expensive for individual artists
to consider purchasing.
You wrote a paper about procedural generation of sculptural forms, could you in laymans terms explain this to us?
It is part of a process in which one envisions a 3D form, thinks of its
mathematical representation, writes a program to generate a description
of the form, then uses additive freeform technology to physically
realize the description. Certain complex structures are most easily
realized with a generative program as an intermediate step.
Is a procedurally generated sculpture a sculpture? In what sense?
By definition. (It isn’t necessarily a “good” sculpture, but that is
an issue independent of the material.) A procedurally generated
sculpture can be visually engaging, it can make you think, it can evoke
emotions, it can open your imagination to new possibilities, it can
delight the senses, it can give you a peek into the mind of the artist
who causes it to exist. These are all things one looks for in
There seems to me to be less ‘intent’ and ‘expression’ than in a traditional sculpture?
I don’t think so. To appreciate any genre of art requires some
education and alot of individual study. Take my course and I bet you
will see more.
You also enjoy mathematical puzzles?
Yes, especially geometric assembly puzzles, which have much in common
with my sculpture. But all kinds of puzzles can be fun and serve to
open the mind to new directions. They are great for teaching people
that there isn’t usually a cookbook solution to problems.
Objects need to be 2 manifold to be 3D printed, I’ve been unable to
explain this well to anyone, possibly because I don’t understand it.
Can you explain it for us?
Not concisely. It often takes a while to understand even when I explain
it to my students in class after class.
Four-Dimensional Polytope Projection Barn Raisings, uuum?
They’re great fun! I like to organize various kinds of “nerd parties”
in which people come together and form a community that creates
something cool. Along the way, the professor in me tries to convey a
bit of something educational as well. Four-Dimensional Polytope
Projection Barn Raisings are one example of that. You can get a sense
of them from pictures on my web pages, but you really must attend one
to feel the joy of participatory mathematical constructions.
The resulting polytope models seem really beautiful to me, is it because of my natural attraction to symmetry?
It is because they are really beautiful.
How did you initially become involved with the technology?
I had an “inside man” who liked making some models for me on the side,
as they were cooler than the other jobs he had to do.
What has changed over the years?
The cost is coming down and more people are becoming aware of its
incredible power to create any form one can think of. The imagination
is now the limiting factor in design, not the hands.
Do you see this as becoming a mass market technology?
I expect that in under ten years there will be machines in service
bureaus everywhere, like Kinkos has photocopiers, then every college,
then every high school. The types of individuals who now have drill
presses or table saws will also have additive fabrication machinery.
Mathematics is of fundamental importance to our society and will only
become more important in the future. But, if I look around myself most
people I know are turned away from it at a young age. As a teacher, is
inspiration an important part of keeping people interested in it? How
could more people understand and be interested in math?
It is a shame, because most people never even see any real math to
appreciate its beauty. People hate how arithmetic is taught to them in
school and, because that is called “math class”, they think they
I love your rhomball model and carry it
with me wherever I go. Did you know that in SLS (Selective Laser Sintering or our White, Strong & Flexible material) it bounces very well?
I have an SLS one, about 3 inches in diameter, which I have
accidentally dropped a few times. But I usually try not to bounce it,
as I can’t easily replace my models.
Mathematics and art seem to be polar opposites for some people: one the
exact, logical, science, hard truths, the “left brain”, the other
romantic, creative, expression, “the right brain.”Would you agree to this or do you seem them much as part of the same thing?
For thousands of years, people studied math for its beauty. All
through history there have been very close connections between art and
math. Math is one of the liberal arts. If we taught students to how
see the beauty of a theorem or the elegance of a proof they might come
at mathematics anew.
Do you like learning more than teaching?
I think so. But even richer are the pleasures of discovering something new on ones own.